let me illustrate this thus: if we take a physics text, it assumes that the learner wants to become a physicist. this is how the proto physics text had started. if you take a padlock we have very advanced securing systems available. most of us however use a proto padlock and rely more on our habits of securing ourselves. let us now take a look at the usb devices. we are not stuck with the old designs. the collaboration of the industry is geared well for good so that the speeds and ease get easily replicated across a sea of consumers. let us now go back to the case of the padlock. the padlock is a big design feature we delve on when we make a house and sometimes we give in to making our padlock uniqueish because of needing to do it in this manner. it makes us feel special about being able to exercise a choice which we give ourselves as a privilege of the house making project. let us here go to a certain kind of people who take expert guidance in choosing the padlock. they go by their trust in an expert who has done the work of choosing padlocks for many other people before. the latter type of house maker would more often than not be found to do highend non-trivial work for a living. the probability of finding a very intelligent person who is relatable to the mainstream ideas of the times is the highest in the latter type of people. being able to trust and being able to find trust with more diverse people as are evidenced in the latter set sets apart the more intelligent people. if we look at the other set of people who want to have the pleasure of responsibility for choosing the padlock design, thinking in terms of old world work ethics, the idea of choosing a padlock is indeed grand if not great for the recall factor of our collective tribulations on the matter of physical safety. noting here that we are using the example of the padlock to explore the big and small of choosing let us run our touch over the surface of this teaser gently and see if we could love this problem a little more it is not rare to see the padlock chooser and expertise user in warring camps even though their houses are none the better for their choices. the expertise users tend to default into this category owing to peer pressure in many cases. the padlock chooser tends to be a chooser of an older version of freedom of choice based on ownership. let us now, if we want, consider how we get to make our choices of buying a smartphone. we can do this by ourselves, although we cannot ignore upon the fact that many of the choices of what kind of smartphones we get to buy are pre-made for us. ( have you heard about smartphones that support modular hardware yet? lg has a model launched at barcelona(?) recently ) now coming back... we said something like being able to trust and being able to find....who are the people in our daily lives who suit this description. the medical professionals - doctors, surgeons, software professionals - coders, testers, security personnel - soldiers, marines, space professionals - astronauts, scientists - the people belonging to these type of professions have or can easily realize labile groups ( in many indian comp

let me illustrate this thus: if we take a physics text, it assumes that the learner wants to become a physicist. this is how the proto physics text had started. if you take a padlock we have very advanced securing systems available. most of us however use a proto padlock and rely more on our habits of securing ourselves. let us now take a look at the usb devices. we are not stuck with the old designs. the collaboration of the industry is geared well for good so that the speeds and ease get easily replicated across a sea of consumers. let us now go back to the case of the padlock. the padlock is a big design feature we delve on when we make a house and sometimes we give in to making our padlock uniqueish because of needing to do it in this manner. it makes us feel special about being able to exercise a choice which we give ourselves as a privilege of the house making project. let us here go to a certain kind of people who take expert guidance in choosing the padlock. they go by their trust in an expert who has done the work of choosing padlocks for many other people before. the latter type of house maker would more often than not be found to do highend non-trivial work for a living. the probability of finding a very intelligent person who is relatable to the mainstream ideas of the times is the highest in the latter type of people. being able to trust and being able to find trust with more diverse people as are evidenced in the latter set sets apart the more intelligent people. if we look at the other set of people who want to have the pleasure of responsibility for choosing the padlock design, thinking in terms of old world work ethics, the idea of choosing a padlock is indeed grand if not great for the recall factor of our collective tribulations on the matter of physical safety. noting here that we are using the example of the padlock to explore the big and small of choosing let us run our touch over the surface of this teaser gently and see if we could love this problem a little more it is not rare to see the padlock chooser and expertise user in warring camps even though their houses are none the better for their choices. the expertise users tend to default into this category owing to peer pressure in many cases. the padlock chooser tends to be a chooser of an older version of freedom of choice based on ownership. let us now, if we want, consider how we get to make our choices of buying a smartphone. we can do this by ourselves, although we cannot ignore upon the fact that many of the choices of what kind of smartphones we get to buy are pre-made for us. ( have you heard about smartphones that support modular hardware yet? lg has a model launched at barcelona(?) recently ) now coming back... we said something like being able to trust and being able to find....who are the people in our daily lives who suit this description. the medical professionals - doctors, surgeons, software professionals - coders, testers, security personnel - soldiers, marines, space professionals - astronauts, scientists - the people belonging to these type of professions have or can easily realize labile groups ( in many indian comp
by Syed Ahamed

February 27, 2016 at 11:18AM
from Facebook
via IFTTTfrom Facebook
via IFTTT