cactus, creeper bearing prickly fruit, a shrub and a cactus in embrace, all sensory things are a first touch into our inside. sensory information evoke in us feelings and emotions. sensory information is a first process and feelings and emotions aroused are imitated or learned. our cultivated feelings and emotions are a useful marker of our group identity, what is good, what is face, what is art, what is smart, something along those lines for an essential band of comfort levels. this forest of knowledge is a nature-like legacy that even a child knows to negotiage and exploit to its favor. new players had a double disadvantage - a deficit of new group ken and a surfeit of own group ken. amidst many pretenders, the success depended upon being quick and exceptional at facing challenges in a way that provoked thought and kindled hope ( for themselves! ). the question of providence was possible to be safely answered by testing the closure of the group, for this was more efficient and in a nature-like manner was easily fashionable out of the fabric. there is then a validity of the question of providence, but the test of closure had to be implemented thoroughly at all gates and by all means. to be sure, it is not only a question of providence that keeps more winds from blowing freely. it is rather a question in abruptions, in avoiding binariness of thought and finding wholeness as would scientists patiently see in brittle shards and broken bone impressions.

cactus, creeper bearing prickly fruit, a shrub and a cactus in embrace, all sensory things are a first touch into our inside. sensory information evoke in us feelings and emotions. sensory information is a first process and feelings and emotions aroused are imitated or learned. our cultivated feelings and emotions are a useful marker of our group identity, what is good, what is face, what is art, what is smart, something along those lines for an essential band of comfort levels. this forest of knowledge is a nature-like legacy that even a child knows to negotiage and exploit to its favor. new players had a double disadvantage - a deficit of new group ken and a surfeit of own group ken. amidst many pretenders, the success depended upon being quick and exceptional at facing challenges in a way that provoked thought and kindled hope ( for themselves! ). the question of providence was possible to be safely answered by testing the closure of the group, for this was more efficient and in a nature-like manner was easily fashionable out of the fabric. there is then a validity of the question of providence, but the test of closure had to be implemented thoroughly at all gates and by all means. to be sure, it is not only a question of providence that keeps more winds from blowing freely. it is rather a question in abruptions, in avoiding binariness of thought and finding wholeness as would scientists patiently see in brittle shards and broken bone impressions.
by Syed Ahamed

January 03, 2016 at 03:18PM
from Facebook
via IFTTTfrom Facebook
via IFTTT